Archaeology.Today
Field Report

Groups Ask Court to Revive Challenge to Bears Ears Reduction

Eight Tribal, conservation, preservation, recreation and scientific organizations have asked a federal court to reopen litigation over Bears Ears National Monument. Their filing challenges President Donald Trump’s July 13, 2026, proclamation, which reduced the monument from about 1.35 million acres to 121,096 acres and sought to end its collaborative management commission.

September 3, 2026
1 Source
Bears Ears National Monument
Groups Ask Court to Revive Challenge to Bears Ears Reduction
The Story

Eight organizations have asked the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to reopen a lawsuit challenging President Donald Trump’s July 13, 2026, proclamation reducing Bears Ears National Monument. The groups are also seeking to expedite their case and file a supplemental complaint addressing the latest order.

The proclamation reduced Bears Ears from approximately 1.35 million acres to 121,096 acres, removing protections from more than 90 percent of the monument, according to the filing announced by the Conservation Lands Foundation. It also terminated, or attempted to terminate, the Bears Ears Commission, a body established to support collaborative management of the landscape.

The plaintiffs are the Conservation Lands Foundation, Utah Diné Bikéyah, Archaeology Southwest, Patagonia Works, The Access Fund, A’Nuche, the National Trust for Historic Preservation and the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology. They argue that the Antiquities Act of 1906 allows presidents to establish national monuments but does not authorize them to revoke or substantially reduce monuments created by earlier administrations. In their view, that power belongs to Congress.

The litigation began in December 2017, after Trump’s first reduction of Bears Ears. The case was assigned to Judge Chutkan and has been administratively closed since early 2021, meaning it has not been on the court’s active docket. The new filing asks that the case be returned to active status.

The organizations say the monument contains ancestral dwellings, rock imagery, ceremonial places, historic structures and other cultural resources. They also point to paleontological sites, ecological habitat and recreational areas. Bears Ears remains connected to the five Tribal Nations that led the effort to establish permanent protection through the Bears Ears Inter-Tribal Coalition: the Hopi Tribe, Navajo Nation, Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation, Ute Mountain Ute Tribe and Zuni Tribe.

The coalition later worked through the Bears Ears Commission with the Bureau of Land Management and U.S. Forest Service on a collaborative management approach. Archaeology Southwest’s Skylar Begay said the groups object both to the monument’s reduction and to the commission’s dismantling.

The filing also cites several mining claims that the organizations say have already been staked illegally within Bears Ears. The plaintiffs said they are prepared to respond if mining, drilling, road construction or other ground-disturbing activities begin.

Reference Desk

Sources & Further Reading

Continue Exploring

Related Archaeology

More stories
Proposed Section 106 Changes Draw Opposition From Archaeologists and Tribes
01
Heritage
Score 210

Proposed Section 106 Changes Draw Opposition From Archaeologists and Tribes

A draft overhaul of the regulations governing Section 106 review has prompted criticism from preservation groups, archaeologists, architects and Tribal Nations. Opponents say the proposal could reduce consultation, narrow which projects undergo review and limit consideration of effects on historic properties.

Read story
Monument Protections Cut as Chaco Buffer Faces Proposed Revocation
02
Heritage
Score 195

Monument Protections Cut as Chaco Buffer Faces Proposed Revocation

Archaeology Southwest reports that executive orders reduce Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante national monuments by nearly 3 million acres, while the Bureau of Land Management seeks to revoke a 20-year protection order covering federal lands around Chaco Culture National Historical Park. Tribal governments and preservation groups are opposing both actions.

Read story
Archaeology Southwest Highlights Threats to Section 106 and Southwest Heritage
03
Discoveries
Score 175

Archaeology Southwest Highlights Threats to Section 106 and Southwest Heritage

A roundup from Archaeology Southwest points to proposed changes to Section 106, border-barrier construction concerns in the Lower Pecos Canyonlands and Big Bend National Park, and potential development near several protected cultural landscapes.

Read story
Archaeology Southwest Essay Warns of Broad Threats to Cultural Preservation
04
Heritage
Score 150

Archaeology Southwest Essay Warns of Broad Threats to Cultural Preservation

A preservation archaeologist’s essay presented at the 2026 Pecos Conference describes what he calls a crisis for archaeology, Tribal sovereignty and cultural-resource protection. The piece lists federal policy changes and proposed developments affecting sites, monuments, museums, archives and archaeological work across the United States.

Read story
Proposed Section 106 Changes Would Narrow Cultural-Resource Review
05
Heritage
Score 80

Proposed Section 106 Changes Would Narrow Cultural-Resource Review

A draft revision to the federal regulations implementing Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act could shorten review periods, remove consideration of indirect and cumulative effects, and reduce protections for traditional cultural places. Archaeology Southwest says the changes come as a separate Bureau of Land Management proposal threatens protections near Chaco Culture National Historical Park.

Read story
BLM Opens Comment Period on Proposed Revocation of Chaco Land Withdrawal
06
Discoveries
Score 60

BLM Opens Comment Period on Proposed Revocation of Chaco Land Withdrawal

The Bureau of Land Management has released a draft Environmental Assessment on revoking a 10-mile minerals leasing withdrawal around Chaco Culture National Historical Park. Archaeology Southwest argues that the assessment does not adequately address potential impacts to cultural sites or incorporate Indigenous traditional knowledge.

Read story